By Jon Utterback
This week I am at the Professional Pricing Society’s Spring Conference in Chicago. It’s always enjoyable to network with other pricing professionals and to learn more about the challenges pricing managers are facing to remain competitive in today’s challenging economy. It also reinforces that those responsible for pricing service parts are faced with even more hurdles. How do you tackle these hurdles and pressures to gain pricing power in service parts?
As discussed in a previous SLMHub post on Service Parts Pricing, there are multiple approaches to managing prices when you are faced with very high volumes of parts, sometimes inconsistent information about competitive prices, and uncertain demand based on many competitors and part/model life cycles.
One general approach to Service Parts Pricing is to focus on Price Alignment. Pure statistical methods sometimes used in setting service parts price levels often miss the need to provide consistent prices with defensible logic to use in customer communication. The Price Alignment approach addresses this issue.
Price Alignment is based on pricing groups of parts by building relationships between parts. These relationships can be based on one or more factors including:
- Simple Part Groups – any collection of parts from which derivative prices can be based on another price
- Part Chains – this is a collection of parts (typically inventoried over time) in which parts have superseded an earlier part
- Part Kits – this represents a collection of parts in which the price of the group of parts (the kit) has a relationship with the sum of the individual parts.
- Tier Relationships – in this approach, pricing relationships are based on one or more inherent part attributes such as form, fit, finish, function, etc.
Simple Part Groups
Simple part groups have pricing relationships established in which multiple part prices are based off of another price. Individual strategies may vary.
Leader/Follower is one typical example. Often there are examples, such as vehicle mirrors, in which prices can be aligned based on part replacement experience. For a typical automobile model, based on multiple color options, there can be dozens of related parts for right-hand and left-hand mirrors. In right-hand driving countries such as the United States, replacements are required much more often on the right side of the vehicle. As a result, part manufacturing volumes are higher for right-hand mirrors leading to lower per-unit costs. A pricing strategy could be established to ensure that right-hand mirror prices are set to equal left-hand mirrors, despite the lower per-unit cost, which will drive higher margins for right-hand mirrors.
Step Level Groups are based on offset relationships between two or more sub-groups. For example, new and remanufactured parts may be grouped to maintain a price relationship reflecting the origin of the part. Then, as various part prices may get adjusted (due to a part supersession or changing sourcing costs), the relationship between the new and remanufactured parts is maintained through the Step Level Group approach.
Branding strategies can also utilize step level pricing. For example, many companies provide a “Good/Better/Best” approach to help drive profitability. Step level pricing can enforce the relationship between branded quality tiers.
These simple group pricing techniques are typically used in conjunction with other pricing strategies than may factor in competitive pricing information, margin targets, and other considerations. Used together, harmonized prices can be propagated across larger parts volumes resulting in better financial performance.
In the next installment on the topic of Service Parts Pricing in the SLMHub, we will discuss using Part Chains price alignment.
Question or comments? I look forward to the discussion.
Jon Utterback, VP, Pricing Product Line, Servigistics, has over 25 years of management consulting, software implementation and product management experience. Throughout most of the past decade, Jon has focused exclusively on pricing and profitability management. Jon is a graduate of Vanderbilt University, where he earned Bachelor of Science degrees in both Computer Science and Mathematics, and Georgia State University, where he earned a Masters in Business Administration in Finance. He is a frequent speaker at Professional Pricing Society conferences and webinars.
Filed under: Service Parts Pricing | Tagged: automotive, manufacturing, Parts Pricing, price alignment | Leave a Comment »







